Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Citizen Kane: Being Simple Is Always The Best

Citizen Kane

Would you watch a movie with all the new, inexperienced actors or experienced and popular ones? Also, would you watch a movie with all the newly invented effects or those with simply long shots, and lightings? I suppose you’ll choose the second option for both question. One surprising fact is that Citizen Kane doesn’t possess any of the characteristics that you haven choose, however, it still has attracted several viewers and supporters all over the world. Why so? Many people say it’s because of its acting, while others say it’s because of its great literary elements. But I think it’s because of its unique script writing and ideas. Maybe this ties in to the phrase “nothing/nobody is perfect”. Like every person, every movie lacks in one criterion which other movies might be better at and vice versa. In this case, since Citizen Kane is lacking in its acting and special effects, it has to make up for it by having an amazing script writing and idea. There is another reason why I respect Citizen Kane for its uniqueness: the way the story is told. Unlike other movies, this movie has incorporated several flashbacks, and portrayed different views of different characters. This is different from a normal movie—which starts with an exposition, conflict, and resolution. This movie starts with a mystery instead. Then slowly, the story goes backwards. This type of showing has not only made the movie seem realistic, but it has also made me feel like I’m involved and responsible for solving the mystery of Kane’s life. Citizen Kane has proved to me that complicated filming isn’t needed for a movie to be considered good; instead, it is the script writing which defines what a good movie is.

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Nothing Is Impossible: The Search For Hope In The Secret Garden

“Where you tend a rose, my lad, A thistle cannot grow” (Burnett). Mary’s servant’s words were the motivation of Mary’s desire to allow Colin to be able to walk again—when Mary looks after Colin, he will be healthy and always well protected. This seemed impossible because according to Colin’s family doctor, Colin is too weak to be able to walk again. The Secret Garden is an adventurous and dictatorial book, which teaches us not only the beauty of nature but also teaches us the importance of not losing hope. The movie has successfully achieved the spirit “hope” of the novel through the use of narrative voiceover, mise en scene, and also by focusing on each characters.

“Even if the roses are dead, there are other things alive”. (Burnett). Mary’s words clearly show how optimistic Mary is, as she still clings on to hope for beauty even though she was exposed to ‘ugly’ sights. The spirit of the novel is shown in the movie through Mary’s voice-over narration. This narrative voiceover has allowed me to feel as though I was in a close relationship with Mary, as I could understand more about her through what she said, and through how she felt about different situations. For example, I initially believed that Colin, a crippled pessimistic young boy Mary meets in her uncle’s house, would never be able to walk, but as I watched the movie, Mary’s actions and words has influenced me so much that I started having hope in her. Throughout the movie, this voiceover narration shows how hope plays an important role in everyday life, because without hope, one will be like Colin, lying down on the bed, thinking about when life would be over for one. The director has further implied on “hope” through film techniques (mise en scene and editing).

Using limited dialogue, the director uses mise en scene to foreshadow Mary’s hope for changing Colin’s future of being able to walk again. Just through this one scene, when Mary Lennox sits in a caravan with her servant, there is an establishing shot of the entire caravan on the long skewed road it has to travel. The entire road, which leads to house, becomes brighter and bigger, creating a message of what’s waiting ahead for Mary— succeed in changing Colin’s future. This scene itself seems to foreshadow Mary’s journey: she will face a lot of troubles (represented by the skewed road), and she will have a long way to travel (the distance of the road), but she will not give up on hope, and achieve her goal (the house). The director has also used some editing to show how much Mary’s teachings as influenced Colin by placing scenes of Mary’s teaching and Colin’s efforts to follow what Mary says next to each other. After each day, there seems to be gradual improvements in Colin’s ability and attitudes towards him walking in a few months later. This then has increased our hope for Colin. However, this wasn’t the end. The director concluded by placing Colin in a bright lighting environment, which contrasts with his dark personality, showing that he is the dominant figure, like a God, who accomplished something that thought to be impossible. Through these mise en scenes and editing, I was able to know more about the tough journey she has to go through, but the movie itself has helped enhance Mary’s hope for Colin by focusing more on each characters.

The film has also captured the spirit of the novel by focusing on respective characters and their actions. Colin, for example, believed that he wouldn’t be able to walk. Just by the focus on Colin’s facial expressions and actions, I was able to notice Colin’s depression, and his pessimistic view towards his life. He would scream in the middle of the night, waking all the servants up, and cry to Mary about how he felt a hump in his spinal cord. But most importantly, the focus on Mary allowed me to notice Mary’s determination to change Colin’s attitude and future. Mary’s actions towards Colin were different from a simple scream—while stomping into his room, frowning and yelling “Someone stop him from screaming! You are so selfish! I’m not going into you’re room anymore!”. She then pushes him, touches his backbone, and does anything that would help Colin to think he will be able to walk. Gradual improvements in Colin through Mary’s actions captures the spirit of the novel, whereby when one doesn’t give up hope and continues supporting others, one will always be able to have a successful outcome.

The Secret Garden is indeed an inspirational movie, which unlike other movies and novels, was able to maintain the exact spirit of the novel. This film has successfully conveyed the spirit of the novel without any distortions of the content, and dialogue, but simply through focusing on the characters, using mise en scene, and with a narrative voiceover. Hope, as proven in both the novel and the movie, plays an important role everyday life, as it helps motivate one to have greater chances of succeeding in life.

The Godfather 1: A Role Model For Non-tech Movies



After watching The Godfather part 1, I have finally found out how I characterize a great movie—one that uses unique film techniques to convey as much plot elements as it could, using less technology, along with an indeterminate ending. Furthermore, I have learnt the true beauty of movie, whereby technology doesn’t determine how great a movie is, instead, the film techniques and story plots determines that.

Throughout the movie, there were several different plot elements and film techniques, which helped to build up the main message of each scene. The most memorable one for me was the verbal irony. When Michael swore faith in church, the director used continuous jump cuts of him saying his faith, and a scene of people getting ready to shoot someone. These two scenes contradicts each other, and the first thought that came up to my mind was how clever it was for the director to create the message of how Michael means the opposite of what he’s saying, and his true evilness simply through jump cuts. It was effective, as it has not only clearly conveyed its message, but it also has helped to increase the viewer’s expectation of what would happen next. All these different film techniques and plot elements helped the movie free from any monotonous scenes and portrayal of characters. Of course, there are much more plot elements and film techniques in the movie one can anticipate.

What amazed me the most was that even though this movie was made in the 1970s, it still is as interesting as the current high-tech movie, Transformers. After watching The Godfather 1, I started valuing movies for its plots and film techniques, rather than the types of technology (such as robots) that are shown in other movies. I believe that movies were originally found for the purpose of relating to real-life, and teaching the viewers valuable lessons; unfortunately, technology has destroyed that purpose. Objects that current technologies make, such as robots, aliens, spaceships seem to distort the main theme of a movie. For example, teenagers and children often watch the movie just to see the new cool effects movie directors have found. Therefore, I have learnt that technology is more like an element used as a back-up or support for the lack of great story plot; in contrast, a movie that has no form of technology but has a great plot helps defines how great a movie is. Therefore, I have concluded that movies that can have a high rate of viewers without any form of complicated technology are considered successful.

I believe this movie could be compared with other current movies, like Transformers, today and still be voted as the top five movie ever made for having the great usage of film techniques, and showing plot especially without any forms of complicated technology inscribed in the movie.